GPS jamming in Switzerland today
Last updated:
Switzerland today: 14.8% of monitored areas are affected.
Source: GPSInterference.com, https://gpsinterference.com/region/switzerland. Free to reuse with this credit and a link.
Nearby
Pages near Switzerland: Western Europe, France, Austria, Belgium, Germany, Slovenia.
Cities and airports
| Place | Share affected | Aircraft affected |
|---|---|---|
| Zurich (ZRH) | 2.4% | 203 of 8,500 |
| Lugano (LUG) | 1.6% | 83 of 5,117 |
| Geneva (GVA) | 1.0% | 60 of 6,172 |
By altitude
Switzerland: mostly low altitude, which points to local, low-power jammers. How this is read.
| Altitude | Aircraft | Share affected |
|---|---|---|
| Below 5,000 ft | 1,187 | 4.5% |
| 5,000 to 15,000 ft | 1,884 | 3.7% |
| 15,000 to 30,000 ft | 2,597 | 1.2% |
| Above 30,000 ft | 6,667 | 0.5% |
Background
Switzerland has banned importing and owning jammers since 1 January 2018, in line with the European Union, according to the Federal Office of Communications, OFCOM (OFCOM). The Federal Office of Civil Aviation received more than 2,100 reports of GPS malfunctions in 2023, 55% more than in 2022 (Swissinfo, 2024). For the reporting on interference in Switzerland, and who it is attributed to, see Western Europe.
Only hexagons whose centre lies inside the borders of Switzerland are counted, so hexagons in neighbouring countries and out at sea are left out. The map is framed on 45.7° N to 47.9° N and 5.9° E to 10.6° E.
Switzerland is counted under Western Europe.
Worst and best days on record
- The worst day on record for Switzerland was 18 April 2026, when 55.6% of its monitored areas were affected (15 of 27).
- The best day on record for Switzerland was 18 August 2026, when 0.0% of its monitored areas were affected (0 of 27).
Embed this map
Paste this where the Switzerland map should appear. It is free to use and updates by itself.
Open the embed studio to choose the map style, altitude, height and place names, and see a preview.
This page records reported GNSS interference events from publicly available sources. It makes no claim about the source, intent or attribution of any event. Place names and boundaries follow the underlying data provider and do not imply any position on sovereignty or territorial status.