GPS jamming in Portugal today
Last updated:
Portugal today: 0.0% of monitored areas are affected.
Source: GPSInterference.com, https://gpsinterference.com/region/portugal. Free to reuse with this credit and a link.
Nearby
Pages near Portugal: Western Europe, Spain, Morocco, France, Switzerland, Ireland.
Cities and airports
| Place | Share affected | Aircraft affected |
|---|---|---|
| Porto Francisco Sá Carneiro (OPO) | 0.4% | 10 of 2,447 |
| Faro (FAO) | 0.3% | 5 of 1,706 |
| Lisbon Humberto Delgado (LIS) | 0.3% | 8 of 3,093 |
By altitude
Portugal: no clear altitude pattern. How this is read.
| Altitude | Aircraft | Share affected |
|---|---|---|
| Below 5,000 ft | 785 | 1.0% |
| 5,000 to 15,000 ft | 1,647 | 0.1% |
| 15,000 to 30,000 ft | 2,300 | 0.0% |
| Above 30,000 ft | 6,364 | 0.0% |
Background
We found no report of GPS jamming or spoofing in Portuguese airspace, and no statement on it from the civil aviation authority, ANAC. The communications regulator, ANACOM, enforces the rules on radio equipment; in 2022 it ran joint inspections with the Maritime Police along the coast between Caminha and Peniche (IARU Region 1, 2022). For the reporting on interference in Portugal, and who it is attributed to, see Western Europe.
Only hexagons whose centre lies inside the borders of Portugal are counted, so hexagons in neighbouring countries and out at sea are left out. The map is framed on 32.5° N to 42.2° N and 17.4° W to 6.1° W.
Portugal is counted under Western Europe.
Worst and best days on record
- The worst day on record for Portugal was 13 March 2026, when 14.0% of its monitored areas were affected (6 of 43).
- The best day on record for Portugal was 8 November 2026, when 0.0% of its monitored areas were affected (0 of 43).
Embed this map
Paste this where the Portugal map should appear. It is free to use and updates by itself.
Open the embed studio to choose the map style, altitude, height and place names, and see a preview.
This page records reported GNSS interference events from publicly available sources. It makes no claim about the source, intent or attribution of any event. Place names and boundaries follow the underlying data provider and do not imply any position on sovereignty or territorial status.